Advisory Opinions Library
Search and research 1,071 opinions published by the Minnesota Department of Administration (1993–present). New to the legal archive? Try Exploring by topic.
Where this category sits in our topic hierarchy
Data Subject Rights & Notice (132 opinions)
Data subjects
-
Advisory Opinion 01-089 01-089Is Moose Lake Regional State Operated Services Policy # 24.6, Section IV, of the Minnesota Sex Offender Program, in compliance with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13?
-
Advisory Opinion 01-081 01-081Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, may Independent School District 194, Lakeville, provide to the Lakeville Police Department, in connection with a report of a possible crime, the following data, without consen…
-
Advisory Opinion 01-065 01-065Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, what is the classification of the following data that School District 271, Bloomington, maintains: a letter to an employee of the District?
-
Advisory Opinion 01-062 01-062Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did Independent School District 2169, Murray County Central Schools, inappropriately disseminate private data during a July 31, 2000, special meeting of the School Board?
-
Advisory Opinion 01-041 01-041Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did Independent School District 281, Robbinsdale, respond appropriately to a data subject's request for access to data?
-
Advisory Opinion 01-040 01-040If the City of Woodbury requires an individual to supply his/her Social Security number as part of applying for a firearm permit, has the City violated that individual's rights under state and federal law?
-
Advisory Opinion 01-035 01-035Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did Isanti County violate X's rights concerning a consent to release information that X was asked to provide the County?
-
Advisory Opinion 01-021 01-021Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did School District 11, Anoka-Hennepin, inappropriately disseminate private educational data?
-
Advisory Opinion 01-016 01-016Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did School District 625, St. Paul, respond appropriately to X's September 20, 2000, request to gain access to a
-
Advisory Opinion 00-073 00-073Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did Goodhue County respond appropriately to a September 7 (or 8), 1999, request by X for data about X and X's child?
-
Advisory Opinion 00-060 00-060Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did the City of Deephaven respond appropriately to a September 11, 2000, data subject's request for access to data?
-
Advisory Opinion 00-043 00-043Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 13.04, subdivision 4, what is a government entity's obligation to include a data subject's
-
Advisory Opinion 00-031 00-031Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, if the Ramsey County Human Services Department has not responded to a data subject's February 2, 2000, challenge to the accuracy and/or completeness of data, has the County vi…
-
Advisory Opinion 00-012 00-012Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did School District 272, Eden Prairie, respond appropriately to a parent's request for data about his child?
-
Advisory Opinion 00-004 00-004Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, what is the classification of the data in the following document: the Office of Crime Victims Ombudsman Critical Report #9900029? To the extent that any of the data in the Rep…
-
Advisory Opinion 99-025 99-025Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, will the data subject's rights be violated if other University of Minnesota employees are allowed access to his Social Security number?
-
Advisory Opinion 99-021 99-021Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, has the Metropolitan Airports Commissioner responded appropriately to a data subject's request for access to data about him/her?
-
Advisory Opinion 99-010 99-010Were the Js' rights under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, violated when Carlton County disseminated a June 9, 1998, document pursuant to consent to release forms dated May 28, 1998?
-
Advisory Opinion 99-004 99-004Have A's rights under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, been violated if the Minnesota Board of Medical Practice collected data from A about A and did not supply him/her with a Tennessen Warning notice?
-
Advisory Opinion 99-002 99-002Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did the Freeborn County Department of Human Services respond appropriately to a data subject's request for access to data?
-
Advisory Opinion 98-053 98-053Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, did the Central Minnesota Mental Health Center respond appropriately to an October 1, 1998, request by a data subject?
-
Advisory Opinion 98-043 98-043Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, what is the classification of the data contained in a complaint against a City of New Market employee?
-
Advisory Opinion 98-042 98-042Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13 and Section 181.932, would the rights of certain Koch Refining Company employees be violated if the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency released, to the public, data contained in…Civil investigative data Data subjects Educational data Statutory construction (Ch. 645) Tennessen warning Tennessen warning #Absurd or unreasonable result (645.17) #Individual vs. person (13.02, subd. 4, 5 and 10) #Law enforcement agencies exempt #Limitation on collection/use of data (13.05, subd. 4) #Pollution Control Agency
-
Advisory Opinion 98-018 98-018Did the Minnesota Department of Economic Security violate M's rights by inappropriately disseminating private data about M?
-
Advisory Opinion 98-007 98-007Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Sections 13.04 (subdivision 2), 13.05, 13.43, and 13.49, have the rights of the data subjects been violated because the Grand Rapids Public Utilities Commission did not provide a Tennessen…