Advisory Opinions Library
Search and research 1,071 opinions published by the Minnesota Department of Administration (1993–present). New to the legal archive? Try Exploring by topic.
Where this category sits in our topic hierarchy
Requesting & Accessing Data (391 opinions)
Requests for data
Narrow down within “Requesting & Accessing Data”
-
Advisory Opinion 01-013 01-013Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 13.05, subdivision 12, is it appropriate for the Minnesota Department of Employee Relations to ask a data requestor to identify him/herself and to justify the request?
-
Advisory Opinion 01-010 01-010Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 13.05, subdivision 12, is it appropriate for the Minnesota Department of Children, Families, and Learning to ask a data requestor to identify him/herself and to justify the reques…
-
Advisory Opinion 01-009 01-009Pursuant to Minnesota Statues, section 13.05, subdivision 12, is it appropriate for Intermediate District 287 to ask a data requestor to identify him/herself and to justify the request?
-
Advisory Opinion 01-008 01-008Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 13.05, subdivision 12, is it appropriate for School District 273, Edina, to ask a data requestor to identify him/herself and to justify the request?
-
Advisory Opinion 01-007 01-007Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 13.05, subdivision 12, is it appropriate for the Minnesota Department of Human Services to ask a data requestor to identify him/herself and to justify the request?
-
Advisory Opinion 01-003 01-003Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did School District 270, Hopkins, respond appropriately to a request to access data made on October 20, 2000?
-
Advisory Opinion 01-005 01-005Did MnSCU respond appropriately to a data subject's January 4, 2000, request for data within the time frame set forth in Minnesota Statutes, section 13.04? Was MnSCU's February 22, 2000, response to a data subject's Jan…
-
Advisory Opinion 01-004 01-004Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did School Disrict 284., Wayzata, respond appropriately to a request to access data made on October 20, 2000?
-
Advisory Opinion 00-063 00-063Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, is the public entitled to gain access to the following data maintained by the City of Windom: the job status of, and compensation and benefits received by, a City employee fol…
-
Advisory Opinion 00-041 00-041Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, has the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources responded appropriately to requests for access to government data made on October 20, 1998, and June 7, 2000?
-
Advisory Opinion 00-039 00-039Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, and Minnesota Statutes section 144.226, may Ramsey County charge a fee for inspection of vital records?
-
Advisory Opinion 00-034 00-034Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did Blue Earth County respond appropriately to a request to gain access to two books prepared by the following land viewers: W.A. Frederickson and Bert Hanson?
-
Advisory Opinion 00-033 00-033Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did the City of Ely respond appropriately to an April 19, 2000, request for access to data? Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did the City of Ely respond appropriate…
-
Advisory Opinion 00-026 00-026Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, may the City of Greenwood require a $50.00 deposit as part of a request to inspect government data? Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, has the City of Greenwood respo…
-
Advisory Opinion 00-020 00-020Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, what is the classification of the data contained in a student petition that criticizes the performance of a District employee? Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, may …
-
Advisory Opinion 00-018 00-018Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did Independent School District 11, Anoka-Hennepin, respond properly, i.e., did the District fully comply with an April 10, 2000, request for access to data?
-
Advisory Opinion 00-016 00-016Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did the City of Woodbury respond properly to a verbal request of September 20, 1999, and a written request of October 20, 1999, for access to public data?
-
Advisory Opinion 00-008 00-008Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, has the City of Roseville responded appropriately to requests for access to the following data:
-
Advisory Opinion 99-046 99-046Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, sections 13.03 and 13.04, did the University of Minnesota respond appropriately to an April 14, 1999, request for access to data?
-
Advisory Opinion 99-033 99-033Did the Minnesota Department of Human Rights respond appropriately to a data subject's request for access to all data maintained about him/her?
-
Advisory Opinion 99-026 99-026Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did the City of Duluth Housing and Redevelopment Authority respond properly to a request for public access to the so-called
-
Advisory Opinion 99-023 99-023Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, did the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources respond appropriately to a request for access to muskellunge data contained in public reports and surveys?
-
Advisory Opinion 98-049 98-049Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, in light of Minnesota Department of Health Rule 4600.5800 (Commercial Use), can public access to vital records be denied if a member of the public refuses to sign a promise tha…
-
Advisory Opinion 98-044 98-044Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, did the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency respond in a timely fashion to a request by the Star Tribune for access to data? Did the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency violate t…
-
Advisory Opinion 98-025 98-025Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 13.04, were C's rights violated if School District 709, Duluth, did not provide a timely response to data requested by C in his/her February 11, 1997, letter? Pursuant to Minnesota…