Advisory Opinions Library
Search and research 1,071 opinions published by the Minnesota Department of Administration (1993–present). New to the legal archive? Try Exploring by topic.
Where this category sits in our topic hierarchy
Requesting & Accessing Data (391 opinions)
Response to data requests
Narrow down within “Requesting & Accessing Data”
Response to data requests (202)
Copy costs (103)
Requests for data (88)
Inspection (49)
Existence of data (27)
Redaction (20)
Multiple data subjects (19)
Summary data (12)
Standing requests (3)
-
Advisory Opinion 04-061 04-061Did the City of Warren comply with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, in responding to an August 4, 2004, request to inspect certain data?
-
Advisory Opinion 04-060 04-060Did Independent School District 833, South Washington County, comply with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, in responding to a March 2, 2004, request for access to data?
-
Advisory Opinion 04-055 04-055Did Todd County comply with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, in charging $16 for copying and faxing eleven pages of minutes from three County Board meetings?
-
Advisory Opinion 04-054 04-054Did the Benton County Auditor/Treasurer's office comply with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, in charging $1 for a one-page copy of a computer printout of tax information relating to a specific parcel of property?
-
Advisory Opinion 04-053 04-053Did the Benton County Recorder's office comply with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, in charging $3.50 for copies of seven pages of data relating to the mortgage on a specific parcel of property?
-
Advisory Opinion 04-044 04-044Did the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board comply with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, in its determination regarding a March 12, 2004, request for government data?
-
Advisory Opinion 04-032 04-032Did Independent School District 700, Hermantown, comply with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, in responding to a data subject's request for a copy of her time sheets?
-
Advisory Opinion 04-031 04-031Is the Ramsey County Sheriff's Office in compliance with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, by refusing to allow the Shoreview Press to review the forms or documents on which public response or incident data are recorded?
-
Advisory Opinion 04-029 04-029Has Independent School District 11, Anoka-Hennepin, complied with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, in its determination regarding an April 2, 2004, request for copies of data? Has Independent School District 11, Anoka-He…
-
Advisory Opinion 04-027 04-027Has the City of Minneapolis complied with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, in its determination regarding a September 3, 2003, request for access to data?
-
Advisory Opinion 04-026 04-026Did Dakota County comply with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, in its determination regarding a data subject's January 15, 2004, request for a
-
Advisory Opinion 04-022 04-022Has Independent School District 272, Eden Prairie, complied with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, in its determination regarding an October 6, 2003, request for a copy of all Data Practices policies utilized by the Distr…
-
Advisory Opinion 04-011 04-011Has Independent School District 2143, Waterville-Elysian-Morristown, complied with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, in its determination regarding a November 28, 2003, request for access to directory information?
-
Advisory Opinion 04-008 04-008Has the Minnesota Department of Transportation complied with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, in its determination regarding an October 20, 2003, request for access to data?
-
Advisory Opinion 03-041 03-041Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did the Minnesota Department of Corrections respond appropriately to a request for access to the following data: booking data that previously were accessible to the public as …
-
Advisory Opinion 03-037 03-037Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did the City of Brainerd respond appropriately to a July 30, 2003, request by a data subject for the City to explain the meaning of certain data?
-
Advisory Opinion 03-034 03-034Whether the information sought in the information request attached hereto as Exhibit B is public data that must be disclosed under Minnesota Statutes, section 13.03? Whether the information sought in the information req…
-
Advisory Opinion 03-031 03-031Pursuant to Minnesota Statues, Chapter 13, did Independent School District 832, Mahtomedi, respond appropriately to a June 27, 2003, request to inspect private data?
-
Advisory Opinion 03-030 03-030Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did Independent School District 832, Mahtomedi, respond appropriately to a June 5, 2003, request for copies of the following data about a student's order and payment for a hig…
-
Advisory Opinion 03-028 03-028Is the City of Farmington in compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, and Minnesota Rules, Chapter 1205, with regard to the appointment of a responsible authority? Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes…
-
Advisory Opinion 03-024 03-024Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 13.04, did the City of Brainerd respond appropriately to a March 12, 1997, request for access to data?
-
Advisory Opinion 03-016 03-016Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did the Minnesota Department of Education (MDE) respond appropriately to a February 12, 2003, request for copies of all correspondence for the last two years between Independe…
-
Advisory Opinion 02-052 02-052Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did the Kandiyohi County Sheriff respond appropriately to a request for access to data by the data subject?
-
Advisory Opinion 02-034 02-034Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, sections 13.03 and 13.43, did School District 276, Minnetonka, respond appropriately to a June 14, 2002, request to review the following data:
-
Advisory Opinion 02-032 02-032Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 13.03, did Minnetonka Public Schools District 276 respond appropriately to a July 3, 2002, request to review the following data: