Advisory Opinions Library
Search and research 1,071 opinions published by the Minnesota Department of Administration (1993–present). New to the legal archive? Try Exploring by topic.
Where this category sits in our topic hierarchy
Data Subject Rights & Notice (132 opinions)
Tennessen warning
Narrow down within “Data Subject Rights & Notice”
-
Advisory Opinion 99-004 99-004Have A's rights under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, been violated if the Minnesota Board of Medical Practice collected data from A about A and did not supply him/her with a Tennessen Warning notice?
-
Advisory Opinion 98-043 98-043Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, what is the classification of the data contained in a complaint against a City of New Market employee?
-
Advisory Opinion 98-042 98-042Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13 and Section 181.932, would the rights of certain Koch Refining Company employees be violated if the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency released, to the public, data contained in…Civil investigative data Data subjects Educational data Statutory construction (Ch. 645) Tennessen warning Tennessen warning #Absurd or unreasonable result (645.17) #Individual vs. person (13.02, subd. 4, 5 and 10) #Law enforcement agencies exempt #Limitation on collection/use of data (13.05, subd. 4) #Pollution Control Agency
-
Advisory Opinion 98-007 98-007Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Sections 13.04 (subdivision 2), 13.05, 13.43, and 13.49, have the rights of the data subjects been violated because the Grand Rapids Public Utilities Commission did not provide a Tennessen…
-
Advisory Opinion 98-003 98-003Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 13.04, subdivision 2, were M's rights violated when the Minnesota Department of Public Safety collected private data about M and 1) did not provide him/her with a complete
-
Advisory Opinion 98-001 98-001Did the District comply with Minnesota Statutes Section 13.04, subdivision 2, when it collected private data from H about H upon his/her being hired in 1991? Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 13.04, in 1994, did th…
-
Advisory Opinion 97-043 97-043Did Wadena County comply with the requirements of Minnesota Statutes Section 13.04, subdivision 2, when, as part of an evaluation, it collected information about the data subject?
-
Advisory Opinion 97-032 97-032Has School District #273, Edina, failed to comply with the requirements of Minnesota Statutes Section 13.04, subdivision 2, because it did not provide a Tennessen Warning notice to H and H's parents upon collection of d…
-
Advisory Opinion 97-015 97-015Were the data collected by Dr. Seymour Gross, a Hennepin County employee, from
-
Advisory Opinion 96-062 96-062Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 13.04, subdivision 2, was J entitled to receive a
-
Advisory Opinion 96-047 96-047Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, must a government entity honor standing requests for data? Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 13.42, what is the classification of directory information on persons recently…
-
Advisory Opinion 96-016 96-016Upon a request for access to data by a data subject, does a government entity have authority, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, to require the data subject to provide the following data: date of request; studen…
-
Advisory Opinion 96-014 96-014Has the City of Virginia complied with the requirements of Minnesota Statutes Section 13.04, subdivision 3, regarding access to data by a data subject? Does a copy charge of $.25 per page represent the
-
Advisory Opinion 96-011 96-011Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 13.05, subdivision 4, and Minnesota Rules Part 1205.1300, how may DHS use and/or disseminate the data which relate to K's commitment as a minor, contained on theData subjects Educational data Law enforcement data Legislative authority and intent Tennessen warning Welfare data #Authority to regulate data practices #Classification at time of request, controls access (13.03, subd. 9) #Commitment pre-petition screening #Firearms background check #Limitation on collection and use of private/confidential data (13.05, subd. 4)
-
Advisory Opinion 95-035 95-035Is the Brooklyn Park Police Civil Service Commission aData subjects Educational data Informed consent Personnel data Tennessen warning #Civil investigative data (13.39) #Consent needed for new use of data if notice was not given #Data necessary for administration and management of programs (13.05, subd. 3) #Informed consent #Mental impressions (See: Keezer v. Spickard, 493 N.W.2d 614)
-
Advisory Opinion 95-028 95-028Is a
-
Advisory Opinion 95-010 95-010Is X entitled to gain access to data maintained about him by the Olmsted County Community Services Department?
-
Advisory Opinion 95-007 95-007Does Bemidji State University have the authority to require faculty members to provide their Social Security numbers and birth dates for the purposes of student registration, or is this a violation of Minnesota Statutes…
-
Advisory Opinion 94-012 94-012As to the non-government providers and facilities which have to supply data on individual patients pursuant to the rules, is any relationship created which would require them to give the Tennessen Warning? In light of c…
-
Advisory Opinion 93-004 93-004Did the school district violate Minnesota Statutes Section 13.04, Subd. 3 by failing to provide a copy of the statement to X's parents after their verbal and written requests for same? Does the state Department of Admin…