Advisory Opinions Library
Search and research 1,071 opinions published by the Minnesota Department of Administration (1993–present). New to the legal archive? Try Exploring by topic.
Narrow down within “Requesting & Accessing Data”
-
Advisory Opinion 01-012 01-012Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, has School District 1, Minneapolis, responded appropriately to a September 7, 2000, request for access to data?
-
Advisory Opinion 01-011 01-011Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did the City of Greenwood respond appropriately to a request to inspect all
-
Advisory Opinion 01-010 01-010Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 13.05, subdivision 12, is it appropriate for the Minnesota Department of Children, Families, and Learning to ask a data requestor to identify him/herself and to justify the reques…
-
Advisory Opinion 01-009 01-009Pursuant to Minnesota Statues, section 13.05, subdivision 12, is it appropriate for Intermediate District 287 to ask a data requestor to identify him/herself and to justify the request?
-
Advisory Opinion 01-008 01-008Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 13.05, subdivision 12, is it appropriate for School District 273, Edina, to ask a data requestor to identify him/herself and to justify the request?
-
Advisory Opinion 01-007 01-007Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 13.05, subdivision 12, is it appropriate for the Minnesota Department of Human Services to ask a data requestor to identify him/herself and to justify the request?
-
Advisory Opinion 01-003 01-003Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did School District 270, Hopkins, respond appropriately to a request to access data made on October 20, 2000?
-
Advisory Opinion 01-005 01-005Did MnSCU respond appropriately to a data subject's January 4, 2000, request for data within the time frame set forth in Minnesota Statutes, section 13.04? Was MnSCU's February 22, 2000, response to a data subject's Jan…
-
Advisory Opinion 01-004 01-004Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did School Disrict 284., Wayzata, respond appropriately to a request to access data made on October 20, 2000?
-
Advisory Opinion 01-001 01-001Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did School District 272, Eden Prairie, respond appropriately to a request to access data made on October 20, 2000?
-
Advisory Opinion 00-077 00-077Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did School District 625 (St. Paul) respond appropriately to a January 28, 2000 request for summary data?
-
Advisory Opinion 00-076 00-076Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did the City of Minneapolis respond appropriately to a request, made at a meeting in late June, for access to a complete police report regarding an incident that occurred on D…
-
Advisory Opinion 00-070 00-070Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did School District 11, Anoka-Hennepin, respond appropriately to an October 30, 2000, request for copies of private data, by stating that the data would not be made available …
-
Advisory Opinion 00-069 00-069Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did School District 11, Anoka-Hennepin, respond appropriately to an October 30, 2000, request for copies of private data, by stating that the data would not be made available …
-
Advisory Opinion 00-068 00-068Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did School District 11, Anoka-Hennepin, respond appropriately to an October 10, 2000, request for copies of private data, by stating that the data would not be made available …
-
Advisory Opinion 00-066 00-066Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did School District 11, Anoka-Hennepin, respond appropriately to a September 11, 2000, request for copies of private data by charging a copy fee for two pages when the request…
-
Advisory Opinion 00-065 00-065Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did Intermediate District 287 respond appropriately to an August 24, 2000, request for access to data about job applicants? Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did Int…Elected and appointed officials Multiple data subjects Personnel data Redaction #Data incidental to the data subject #Finalist for public employment (13.43, subd. 3) #Inextricably intertwined data (See also: Northwest Publications, Inc. v. City of Bloomington, 499 N.W.2d 509) #Interviews #Interviews
-
Advisory Opinion 00-063 00-063Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, is the public entitled to gain access to the following data maintained by the City of Windom: the job status of, and compensation and benefits received by, a City employee fol…
-
Advisory Opinion 00-062 00-062Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, has the Minnesota Department of Employee Relations (DOER) responded appropriately to a data subject's July 13, 2000, request to have access to all data about him/herself if DO…
-
Advisory Opinion 00-060 00-060Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did the City of Deephaven respond appropriately to a September 11, 2000, data subject's request for access to data?
-
Advisory Opinion 00-059 00-059Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did the City of Deephaven respond appropriately to a September 11, 2000, request to inspect public data?
-
Advisory Opinion 00-057 00-057Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did the City of Lakeville respond appropriately to requests for data made on the following dates: verbal request on 11/8/99 verbal request on 11/9/99 verbal request on 11/24…
-
Advisory Opinion 00-056 00-056Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did School District 11, Anoka-Hennepin, respond appropriately to a September 14, 2000, request for copies of private data?
-
Advisory Opinion 00-055 00-055Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did School District 11, Anoka-Hennepin, respond appropriately to a September 11, 2000, request for copies of private data?
-
Advisory Opinion 00-054 00-054Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did School District 11, Anoka-Hennepin, respond appropriately to an August 9, 2000, request for copies of private data?