Advisory Opinions Library
Search and research 1,071 opinions published by the Minnesota Department of Administration (1993–present). New to the legal archive? Try Exploring by topic.
-
Advisory Opinion 01-071 01-071Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did the Minnesota Department of Children, Families and Learning respond appropriately to an June 5, 2001, request to inspect government data?
-
Advisory Opinion 01-070 01-070Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, what is the classification of the following data that the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources maintains: all identifying data about Minnesota State Conservation Officers…
-
Advisory Opinion 01-069 01-069What is the classification of previous and current reports about X that the Le Sueur County Sheriff maintains? X requested and signed a
-
Advisory Opinion 01-068 01-068Did the City of Farmington respond appropriately to a request for a copy of the City's Police Department Policy Manual when it redacted portions of the Manual pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 13.37?
-
Advisory Opinion 01-067 01-067Is the City of Oak Park Heights in compliance with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, with respect to the following charges for copies of government data: $50.00 per hour for labor, plus an additional $.10 per page, $30.00…
-
Advisory Opinion 01-066 01-066Is the City of Lakeland in compliance with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, with respect to the following charge for copies of government data: $1.00 per page for black and white photocopies?
-
Advisory Opinion 01-065 01-065Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, what is the classification of the following data that School District 271, Bloomington, maintains: a letter to an employee of the District?
-
Advisory Opinion 01-064 01-064Would the public's right to gain access to government data that describe actions taken by employees of the City of Minneapolis be frustrated if the City did not document these activities?
-
Advisory Opinion 01-063 01-063Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did Independent School District 821, Menahga, appropriately deny public access to the following government data: the identities of two District employees whose employment the …
-
Advisory Opinion 01-062 01-062Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did Independent School District 2169, Murray County Central Schools, inappropriately disseminate private data during a July 31, 2000, special meeting of the School Board?
-
Advisory Opinion 01-061 01-061Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did the Minnesota Department of Public Safety respond appropriately to an April 10, 2001, request for copies of government data?
-
Advisory Opinion 01-060 01-060Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did School District 625, St. Paul, inappropriately disseminate data about student X to X's peers?
-
Advisory Opinion 01-059 01-059Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did the Minnesota Department of Employee Relations respond appropriately to a request for the following data: 1) Provide lag triangles detailing claims paid by month of incurr…
-
Advisory Opinion 01-058 01-058Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, and Minnesota Statutes, section 13D.01, did the City of Ellsworth provide appropriate access to the public to all written materials discussed at a December 13, 2000, public ta…
-
Advisory Opinion 01-057 01-057Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, has the City of Vadnais Heights responded appropriately to a request for the following data: 1) complaint/discipline data made against the City's Public Works Director by a pa…
-
Advisory Opinion 01-056 01-056Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did Independent School District 11, Anoka-Hennepin, respond appropriately to a May 12, 2001, request for a fee waiver, on the basis of financial hardship, of a photocopy charg…
-
Advisory Opinion 01-055 01-055Does St. Louis County's decision regarding where it physically maintains data about an employee violate the rights of that employee under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13?
-
Advisory Opinion 01-054 01-054Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did the Minnesota Department of Children, Families and Learning respond appropriately to an April 6, 2001, request to inspect government data?
-
Advisory Opinion 01-053 01-053Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did School District 834, Stillwater, respond appropriately to a request for the following data regarding school expulsions: age, grade level, sex, home town, race, and the act…
-
Advisory Opinion 01-052 01-052When Delta Dental acts under Minnesota Statutes, section 13.04, subdivision 3, to provide access to an individual to welfare data classified as private data on the individual that Delta Dental has generated and stored c…
-
Advisory Opinion 01-051 01-051Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did the Minnesota Department of Public Safety respond appropriately to a request for access to a copy of the audit of the Red Lake Band of Chippewa's gambling operations?
-
Advisory Opinion 01-050 01-050Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did the City of St. Paul Police Department respond appropriately to a March 22, 2001, request for data by denying KSTP-TV access to the identity of the complainant and the tra…
-
Advisory Opinion 01-048 01-048Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, what is the classification of a video tape of the booking area within the secured portion of the Washington County Jail?
-
Advisory Opinion 01-049 01-049Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, may Independent School District 11, Anoka-Hennepin, include a $32.00 per hour fee for labor in its charges for copies of government data, as detailed in letters dated April 9,…
-
Advisory Opinion 01-047 01-047Is Independent School District 11, Anoka-Hennepin, in compliance with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, with respect to the following charges for copies of government data: 1) $.50 per page; 2) $20 per hour for secretaria…