Advisory Opinions Library
Search and research 1,071 opinions published by the Minnesota Department of Administration (1993–present). New to the legal archive? Try Exploring by topic.
Narrow down within “Legal Interpretation & Authority”
-
Advisory Opinion 01-030 01-030Are the Minnesota Department of Public Safety's - specifically the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension's - charges of 1) $250 for a copy of the criminal history database and 2) $15 for a copy of a background check, allowabl…
-
Advisory Opinion 01-009 01-009Pursuant to Minnesota Statues, section 13.05, subdivision 12, is it appropriate for Intermediate District 287 to ask a data requestor to identify him/herself and to justify the request?
-
Advisory Opinion 00-079 00-079Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, what is the classification of ethics opinions/reviews/determinations that the Minnesota Department of Employee Relations prepares pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 43A.3…
-
Advisory Opinion 00-074 00-074Whether the Minnesota Department of Human Services (DHS) responded appropriately to X's request to have access to all data maintained about him/her when the Department provided copies of audio tapes that are difficult t…
-
Advisory Opinion 00-064 00-064Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did St. Paul School District 625 respond appropriately to a July 27, 2000, request for access to public government data?
-
Advisory Opinion 00-062 00-062Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, has the Minnesota Department of Employee Relations (DOER) responded appropriately to a data subject's July 13, 2000, request to have access to all data about him/herself if DO…
-
Advisory Opinion 00-053 00-053Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, and Minnesota Statutes, section 626.556, did Douglas County respond appropriately to requests from Mr. and Mrs. X for access to data about themselves that were collected as pa…
-
Advisory Opinion 00-050 00-050Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did School District 273, Edina, respond appropriately to an August 11, 2000, request for access to data about job applicants? Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did S…
-
Advisory Opinion 00-043 00-043Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 13.04, subdivision 4, what is a government entity's obligation to include a data subject's
-
Advisory Opinion 00-036 00-036Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did the City of Minnetonka respond properly to X's request for access to the following data: the identity of the person(s) who made a complaint about noise at X's home?
-
Advisory Opinion 00-025 00-025Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, did the City of Rochester respond properly to a request for access to data on unpaid parking tickets?
-
Advisory Opinion 00-022 00-022Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did the Ombudsman for Corrections respond appropriately to a request for the following data: report/recommendations/analysis of Moose Lake Sex Offender program treatment failu…
-
Advisory Opinion 00-011 00-011Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did the South Lake Minnetonka Public Safety Department respond properly to a request to inspect the public data contained in the Department's so-called log sheets?
-
Advisory Opinion 99-036 99-036Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, sections 16D.06, subdivision 1, and 201.091, subdivision 4, may the Minnesota Secretary of State disseminate the entire voter registration file to the Minnesota Collection Enterprise divi…
-
Advisory Opinion 99-018 99-018Did Independent School District 15, St. Francis, properly respond to a public request for information regarding its evaluation of the performance of a District employee?
-
Advisory Opinion 99-008 99-008Were the data subject's rights, under Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, violated when the Minnesota Department of Human Services denied access, citing section 13.39, to data s/he requested on November 17, 1998.
-
Advisory Opinion 99-003 99-003Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did the City of the Richfield properly deny access to a tape recording of a closed city council meeting?
-
Advisory Opinion 98-049 98-049Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, in light of Minnesota Department of Health Rule 4600.5800 (Commercial Use), can public access to vital records be denied if a member of the public refuses to sign a promise tha…
-
Advisory Opinion 98-042 98-042Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13 and Section 181.932, would the rights of certain Koch Refining Company employees be violated if the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency released, to the public, data contained in…Civil investigative data Data subjects Educational data Statutory construction (Ch. 645) Tennessen warning Tennessen warning #Absurd or unreasonable result (645.17) #Individual vs. person (13.02, subd. 4, 5 and 10) #Law enforcement agencies exempt #Limitation on collection/use of data (13.05, subd. 4) #Pollution Control Agency
-
Advisory Opinion 98-040 98-040Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, did the Hennepin Conservation District respond properly to H's January 13, 1998, request for access to data? Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, did the Hennepin Conserv…
-
Advisory Opinion 98-036 98-036Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 13.03, did the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board fully comply with a February 26, 1998, request for access to data, and was the response timely?
-
Advisory Opinion 98-021 98-021Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, did the Minnesota State Board of Private Detective and Protective Agent Services respond appropriately to a request to inspect and obtain copies of government data?
-
Advisory Opinion 97-051 97-051Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, did the Minnesota Valley Action Council improperly release private data?
-
Advisory Opinion 97-017 97-017Are health and medical data maintained in the personnel file of a public employee considered medical data within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes Section 13.42, or personnel data under Section 13.43? When a settlement …
-
Advisory Opinion 97-009 97-009May the University of Minnesota deny access to any of the data, exchanged between the University and the law firm of Hogan & Hartson, which relate to the development of the University Board of Regents' tenure code propo…