Advisory Opinion 98-045
October 19, 1998; Minnesota Higher Education Services Office
Background & Issues
An individual requested access to program approval documents submitted by a private school to the Minnesota Higher Education Services Office. The agency asked the Commissioner to determine how these application materials are classified and whether they can be shared with members of the public.
Commissioner Decision
The Commissioner decided that because no law classifies these program approval materials as private or non-public, the records are public. Consequently, the agency is allowed to provide copies of the proposal documentation to anyone who requests them.
Automated synopsis generated for quick reference only — it has not been reviewed word-for-word against the official record and is not legal advice. Always review the full opinion text below for the Commissioner's actual determination, or see the original document on mn.gov. Think this summary misstates the opinion? Report it.
Excerpted Ruling / ConclusionBased on the facts and information provided, my opinion on the issue raised by Mr. Poch is as follows:
1, 2. Pursuant to Section 13.03, subdivision 1, because there are no statutory provisions classifying the data submitted by an applicant or a licensed school to obtain Minnesota Higher Education Services Office's (HESO) approval of a proposed program as not public, the data are public.
October 19, 1998; Minnesota Higher Education Services Office
10/19/1998 10:14:43 AM
This is an opinion of the Commissioner of Administration issued pursuant to section 13.072 of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13 - the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act. It is based on the facts and information available to the Commissioner as described below.
Facts and Procedural History:For purposes of simplification, the information presented by the person who requested this opinion and the response from the government entity with which the person disagrees are presented in summary form. Copies of the complete submissions are on file at the offices of PIPA and, except for any data classified as not public, are available for public access. On August 24, 1998, PIPA received a letter dated August 20, 1998, from Robert Poch, Director of the Minnesota Higher Education Services Office (HESO). In his letter, Mr. Poch requested that the Commissioner issue an opinion regarding the classification of certain data maintained by HESO. A summary of the facts is as follows. Mr. Poch stated, [HESO] is responsible for the enforcement of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 136A.61136A.71[sic], Private Institutions Registration, and Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 141, Private Business, Trade, and Correspondence Schools. He wrote: The Private Institutions Registration Program requires any private postsecondary education institution which is non-profit, grants degrees, or which uses the terms academy, college, institute, or university in its name, to register, with the Services Office and seek approval to grant degrees or to use one of those terms in its name.... The Private Business, Trade, and Correspondence Schools licensure program requires schools under the jurisdiction of Chapter 141 to obtain a license prior to maintaining, advertising, soliciting for, or conducting any course of instruction in Minnesota. [Emphasis added.] Mr. Poch added that an individual recently requested access to documents submitted by a licensed school for a proposed new program. He wrote: Individual programs proposed to be offered by an applicant school or proposed to be offered within a licensed school must be approved by this office before a school can offer them. The process and criteria for program approval document provided to applicants and licensed schools describes what is required and must be completed for each program the school plans to offer. Programs must be approved by this office before they are advertised or included in any document used by the school. Proposed new programs can be submitted to the office at any time. Any changes to an approved program must also be approved in advance by this office. Although Mr. Poch, in his opinion request, discussed HESO's statutory responsibilities under both Chapter 136A and Chapter 141, it appears the issue he raised relates only to those data HESO obtains pursuant to Chapter 141. This opinion is therefore based on that premise. Issues:
In his request for an opinion, Mr. Poch asked the Commissioner to address the following issues:
|