Advisory Opinions Library
Search and research 1,071 opinions published by the Minnesota Department of Administration (1993–present). New to the legal archive? Try Exploring by topic.
Where this category sits in our topic hierarchy
Open Meeting Law (109 opinions)
Closed meetings
-
Advisory Opinion 26-009 26-009The Commissioner Opined that Rush City School Board did not provide an appropriate statement on the record, as required by Minnesota Statutes, section 13D.01, subdivision 3, before closing meetings on January 29, 2026, …
-
Advisory Opinion 23-005 23-005A member of the public asked whether a city council violated the Open Meeting Law when it closed a meeting on the basis of attorney-client privilege to discuss a contract it had with a local school district and decide w…
-
Advisory Opinion 23-004 23-004A data subject asked whether a city council violated the Open Meeting Law when it held multiple closed sessions under Minnesota Statutes, section 13D.05 subd. 2(b), to discuss allegations against an individual subject t…
-
Advisory Opinion 22-009 22-009A member of the public asked whether the school board of a charter school violated the Open Meeting Law when it did not record the closed portion of a meeting and whether the board provided appropriate notice of the pur…
-
Advisory Opinion 22-008 22-008A member of the public asked whether a township board of supervisors violated the Open Meeting Law when it closed a meeting to review applications to appoint a new board supervisor. The board maintained that its meeting…
-
Advisory Opinion 16-003 16-003a newspaper reporter asked whether a city council properly closed a meeting pursuant to the attorney-client privilege exception to the Open Meeting Law (Minn. Stat. § 13D.05, subd. 3(b)). The Commissioner opined that th…
-
Advisory Opinion 16-002 16-002a member of the public asked whether a city council complied with the Open Meeting Law requirement to provide a summary of conclusions following a closed meeting for a performance evaluation (Minn. Stat. § 13D.05, subd.…
-
Advisory Opinion 15-002 15-002A member of the public asked if a City Council had complied with the Open Meeting Law (Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13D) when closing two meetings to evaluate the performance of an individual subject to its authority (un…
-
Advisory Opinion 14-017 14-017A requester asked whether a public body properly closed two meetings on the basis of attorney-client privilege pursuant to section 13D.05, subdivision 2(b). In applying the balancing test required by the Minnesota Supre…
-
Advisory Opinion 14-015 14-015A member of the public asked whether a city council’s conduct under the OML was proper on eight different occasions. The council’s “work sessions” were special, not regular meetings, but the Commissioner could not deter…
-
Advisory Opinion 14-014 14-014A member of the public asked whether a public body properly closed two meetings to discuss the purchase of property, pursuant to section 13D.05, subdivision 3(c)(3). At the meetings, both the Mayor and the City Attorney…
-
Advisory Opinion 14-007 14-007A member of the public asked whether a City had complied with Minnesota Statutes, section 13D.05, subd. 3(a), regarding a summary of the conclusions of an employee’s performance evaluation at the next open meeting. The …
-
Advisory Opinion 14-005 14-005Did the Houston County Board of Commissioners comply with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13D, at its April 8, 2014, meeting?
-
Advisory Opinion 14-004 14-004Did the Cold Spring City Council comply with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13D, at the February 11, 2014, closed meeting? Did the Cold Spring City Council comply with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13D, when it closed the Fe…
-
Advisory Opinion 13-012 13-012A member of the public asked whether a city council had properly closed a meeting for labor negotiation strategies and developments pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, sections 13D.01 and 13D.03. The Commissioner opined tha…
-
Advisory Opinion 12-008 12-008A newspaper asked if a school district complied with the Open Meeting Law regarding its summary of the superintendent's performance evaluation. The Board conducted the evaluation during a closed “workshop” meeting held …
-
Advisory Opinion 08-001 08-001What are the City's duties under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13D, the Open Meeting Law (OML), with regard to releasing or withholding the tapes of the closed meetings? Specifically, may the City Council authorize releas…
-
Advisory Opinion 07-018 07-018Did the members of the Middle Snake Tamarac Rivers Watershed District Board of Managers comply with the notice requirements of Minnesota Statutes, section 13D.04, subdivision 5, for a February 26, 2007, closed meeting, …
-
Advisory Opinion 06-031 06-031Did the members of the Stillwater City Council comply with the Open Meeting Law, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13D, when it closed a meeting that began on January 11, 2005, and was continued on January 12, 2005, to interv…
-
Advisory Opinion 06-020 06-020Did the members of the Minneapolis School Board comply with Minnesota Statutes, section 13D.01, subdivision 3 when they conducted closed meetings on October 25, November 8, November 15, November 29, December 6, December…
-
Advisory Opinion 06-016 06-016Because Minnesota Statutes, section 299A.465, subdivision 6(a), classifies applications and supporting documents as private data, can those documents be released to claimant's employers, who would be responsible for the…
-
Advisory Opinion 06-012 06-012Did the members of the Brunswick Town Board comply with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13D, when they held a meeting outside the territorial limits of Brunswick Township on August 26, 2005? Did the members of the Brunswick…
-
Advisory Opinion 05-027 05-027Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, what is the classification of the following data: audiotapes of two closed Saint Paul Board of Education meetings containing
-
Advisory Opinion 05-013 05-013Pursuant to Chapter 13D, may the Wild Rice Watershed District close an open meeting to discuss its contract with an independent contractor?
-
Advisory Opinion 04-037 04-037Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, if the employee has not given his/her written consent to release data under 49 C.F.R. §382.405(h) and 49 C.F.R. §40.321, what is the classification of the data relating to the…