Advisory Opinions Library
Search and research 1,071 opinions published by the Minnesota Department of Administration (1993–present). New to the legal archive? Try Exploring by topic.
-
Advisory Opinion 06-027 06-027Did the members of the Breezy Point City Council comply with Minnesota Statutes, section 13D.04, subdivision 3 when they held an emergency meeting on July 24, 2006?
-
Advisory Opinion 06-026 06-026What is the classification of the following data that Anoka County maintains: data indicating all licensed child care providers who have received child care assistance payment for services rendered in the past month?
-
Advisory Opinion 06-025 06-025Is the City of Rice in compliance with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, if it releases certain data relating to vehicle accidents to Watab Township?
-
Advisory Opinion 06-024 06-024Did the Metropolitan Airports Commission comply with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, regarding several requests, beginning April 19, 2002, for access to certain invoices for legal fees?
-
Advisory Opinion 06-023 06-023Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, is employee A's copy of the complaint government data? If yes, what is the classification? What, if any, limitations are on employee A disclosing information to the media abou…
-
Advisory Opinion 06-022 06-022Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, how are active warrants classified that are maintained by the City of Moorhead?
-
Advisory Opinion 06-021 06-021What is the classification of the data contained in the letter, which was referenced in the March 10, 2006, Pequot Lakes School Board minutes and subsequently placed in the Superintendent's file?
-
Advisory Opinion 06-020 06-020Did the members of the Minneapolis School Board comply with Minnesota Statutes, section 13D.01, subdivision 3 when they conducted closed meetings on October 25, November 8, November 15, November 29, December 6, December…
-
Advisory Opinion 06-019 06-019Did the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry comply with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, regarding a December 13, 2005, request for access to data?
-
Advisory Opinion 06-018 06-018Did the City of Minneapolis comply with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, in responding to a request for all public data related to a Minneapolis Police Department Internal Affairs Unit investigation of a complaint?
-
Advisory Opinion 06-017 06-017Did the members of the Spring Grove City Council comply with the Open Meeting Law, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13D, on March 31, 2006, when a majority voted by telephone to hire a candidate for the position of accountan…
-
Advisory Opinion 06-016 06-016Because Minnesota Statutes, section 299A.465, subdivision 6(a), classifies applications and supporting documents as private data, can those documents be released to claimant's employers, who would be responsible for the…
-
Advisory Opinion 06-015 06-015Did the Metropolitan Council comply with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, in responding to the Star Tribune's January 17 or 18, 2006, request for a copy of the proposed contract with the transit workers union (that the u…
-
Advisory Opinion 06-014 06-014Did the Minnesota Department of Corrections comply with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, regarding a January 22, 2006, request for data?
-
Advisory Opinion 06-013 06-013Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, what is the classification of the following data that Anoka County maintains: data related to the registration of legal non-licensed child care providers?
-
Advisory Opinion 06-012 06-012Did the members of the Brunswick Town Board comply with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13D, when they held a meeting outside the territorial limits of Brunswick Township on August 26, 2005? Did the members of the Brunswick…
-
Advisory Opinion 06-011 06-011Did Sherburne County comply with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, in denying access to a request to inspect, remotely, certain data the County maintains?
-
Advisory Opinion 06-010 06-010Did the City of North Saint Paul comply with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, in responding to a request for the names and addresses of three individuals, each of whom made a complaint against a City police officer?
-
Advisory Opinion 06-009 06-009Did the Minnesota Historical Society respond appropriately to a March 14, 2005, request for access to data?
-
Advisory Opinion 06-008 06-008Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, what is the classification of the following data maintained by Independent School District 191, Burnsville-Eagan-Savage: data in five memoranda relating to a former District e…
-
Advisory Opinion 06-007 06-007Is Hampton Township's determination that it is not subject to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, appropriate given the definition of political subdivision in section 13.02, subdivision 11? If Hampton Township is subject to…
-
Advisory Opinion 06-006 06-006Did the Minnesota Department of Revenue comply with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, in responding to a June 5, 2005, request for access to data relating to an investigation?
-
Advisory Opinion 06-005 06-005Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, what is the classification of the following data that the Minnesota Department of Public Safety maintains: a response to a Department request for proposal?
-
Advisory Opinion 06-004 06-004Did the Red River Watershed Management Board comply with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, in responding to an August 25, 2005, request for data?
-
Advisory Opinion 06-003 06-003Did the Red River Watershed Management Board comply with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, in responding to an August 29, 2005, request to inspect