Advisory Opinions Library
Search and research 1,071 opinions published by the Minnesota Department of Administration (1993–present). New to the legal archive? Try Exploring by topic.
-
Advisory Opinion 98-001 98-001Did the District comply with Minnesota Statutes Section 13.04, subdivision 2, when it collected private data from H about H upon his/her being hired in 1991? Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 13.04, in 1994, did th…
-
Advisory Opinion 97-055 97-055Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Sections 13.03 and 13.43, has the University of Minnesota responded properly to an October 13, 1997, request for access to data?
-
Advisory Opinion 97-054 97-054What is the classification of the following data maintained by the Minnesota Department of Revenue: 1) the Department's unit valuation detail for the Duluth, Missabe and Iron Range Railway Company (DM&IR) for property t…
-
Advisory Opinion 97-053 97-053Has the Minnesota Department of Human Rights responded properly, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, to a data subject's request for access to data?
-
Advisory Opinion 97-052 97-052Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 13.03, has the Minnesota Department of Finance responded appropriately to a request for access to data?
-
Advisory Opinion 97-051 97-051Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, did the Minnesota Valley Action Council improperly release private data?
-
Advisory Opinion 97-050 97-050Would it be a violation of students' rights under Minnesota Statutes Sections 13.32 if School District #347, Willmar, disseminated (without obtaining either consent or a court order) the following data to law enforcemen…
-
Advisory Opinion 97-049 97-049Has Independent School District 196 complied with Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13 in denying public access to a copy of the District's employee e-mail directory?
-
Advisory Opinion 97-048 97-048Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, did the Ramsey County Sheriff's Office respond appropriately to a June 20, 1997, request for access to data?
-
Advisory Opinion 97-047 97-047Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 13.46, has the Anoka County Metro Regional Treatment Center responded appropriately to a request for access to data by the data subject?
-
Advisory Opinion 97-046 97-046Has the City of St. Paul complied with the requirements of Minnesota Statutes Section 13.03, subdivision 3, in charging $1,020.60 for copies of public data?
-
Advisory Opinion 97-045 97-045Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 13.32, the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, and federal rules regarding the confidentiality of alcohol and drug abuse patient records, did School District #194 inappropri…
-
Advisory Opinion 97-044 97-044Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 13.04, subdivision 3, has Mower County responded properly to a July 23, 1997, request for access to data about the deceased data subject?
-
Advisory Opinion 97-043 97-043Did Wadena County comply with the requirements of Minnesota Statutes Section 13.04, subdivision 2, when, as part of an evaluation, it collected information about the data subject?
-
Advisory Opinion 97-042 97-042Did Hennepin County Medical Center comply with the requirements of Minnesota Statutes Section 13.04, subdivision 3, in charging a data subject's representative $19.08 for copies of the data subject's medical data?
-
Advisory Opinion 97-041 97-041Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 13.03, subdivision 3, has the University of Minnesota responded to the following request for government data made in a letter dated May 27, 1997: all existing data pertaining to th…
-
Advisory Opinion 97-040 97-040Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 13.03, subdivision 3, has the University of Minnesota responded properly to requests for access to government data made by Tom Lamphere on June 19, 1997, and June 24, 1997?
-
Advisory Opinion 97-039 97-039What is the classification of the data contained in the following documents maintained by the Minnesota Department of Public Service: documents submitted to the Department by a member of a consulting firm with which the…
-
Advisory Opinion 97-038 97-038Has the City of Lakeville Police Department complied with Minnesota Statutes Section 13.04, subdivision 3, in charging a data subject $6.50 ($5 for the first page and $.50 for each additional page) for copies of data co…
-
Advisory Opinion 97-037 97-037Are the financial records of the general fund of the City of Lafayette Fire Department Relief Association public data under the Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13?
-
Advisory Opinion 97-036 97-036Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 13.03, subdivision 3, did the City of Corcoran properly respond to a March 7, 1997, request for access to the following data: all written materials received by the Corcoran City Co…
-
Advisory Opinion 97-035 97-035Has the University of Minnesota responded properly, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 13.03, to a request for the following data: Copies of itemized receipts for the
-
Advisory Opinion 97-034 97-034Has the Minnesota Department of Transportation responded properly, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 13.04, to a data subject's request for access to data?
-
Advisory Opinion 97-033 97-033Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, have the data subject's rights been violated if the Public Employees Retirement Association of Minnesota (PERA) classifies as public and releases the following data: data conta…
-
Advisory Opinion 97-032 97-032Has School District #273, Edina, failed to comply with the requirements of Minnesota Statutes Section 13.04, subdivision 2, because it did not provide a Tennessen Warning notice to H and H's parents upon collection of d…